Skip navigation

Category Archives: Uncategorized

The night of August 11, 2012 started one of the most hotly contested debates on rape and unwanted sexual advances in this nations history. It was one of the main catylists in the enlightenment of the degree of abuse that exists against women of all ages.

Or so I thought.

It was hoped that the lessons that were learned from that incident and others would lead to a clear understanding of what is considered inappropriate and also would lead to women being treated as equals instead of objects of sex and abuse.

That has turned out not to be the case. It seems that woman are still bullied if they come forward with any kind of accusation of sexual harassment or rape. The practice of victim shaming is once again alive and well.

With the advent of high profile cases of inappropriate conduct of men towards women the guilt or innocence of the accused now depends on the political affiliation of the one being accused.

We have a president who has bragged about unwanted sexual advances being a right of his and have had that bragging dismissed as “locker talk.” We have a politician who has been accused of attempted rape who is running for Senate.

The female governor of that state has stated that she will vote for him in spite of her belief he committed the act simply because she does not want his opponent to win.

There are countless examples out there of current misconduct by those all over the political spectrum. But, rather than debate the current problem with conduct of this nature and ways to stop future incidents,  those on all sides of the political spectrum are going back to even the founding of this country to place blame or to justify the actions of the defendants.

The issue of rape and sexual harassment has become a political issue rather than a moral issue.

Any progress towards ending this kind of abuse stemming from the Big Rape Case has been erased and that should make people be profoundly disappointed.

I know I am.

Stay tuned

MURT

In his latest article, Timothy Holmseth claims that Gloria Allrad, the attorney representing a woman who accused Alabama Senate Candidate Roy Moore of innapropriate conduct, is somehow involved in a baby sale Coverup.

In his article Holmseth writes:

“Audio interviews conducted by Investigative Author Timothy Charles Holmseth with victim’s advocate Wayanne Kruger, reveal that in 2009, Allred was assisting Kruger behind the scenes during the Casey Anthony murder trial, and HaLeigh Cummings kidnapping.”

Holmseth did not get into specifics as to exactly how Ms. Allrad was involved in the alleged coverup but went on to write:

“Kruger represented the mother of a kidnapped girl named HaLeigh Cummings, and detailed to Holmseth an extensive black market baby sales operation……”

Holmseth is referring to Weyanne Kruger, whom he describes as a “representative of the mother of Haleigh Cummings.”

Holmseth did mention Ms Allrad in connection to another case she is involved in:

“In 2017, Allred became involved in the Savanna Greywind womb-raider case in North Dakota when she announced she was representing the family of the slain mother.”

I am certain that there are those out there who would be quite interested to hear whatever response Gloria Allrad may have in regards to Tim Holmseth’s accusations. 

In his article Holmseth claims to have audio recordings that he implies is proof of his accusations.

Holmseth is best known for his numerous conspiracy theories where he accuses quite a number of people of having direct involvement in the kidnapping of Haleigh Cummings. Holmseth believes the child may still alive.

He is the defendant in a growing number of legal actions by those he has accused of various criminal acts involving missing and murdered children.

Stay tuned

MURT

I do not think that anyone would have imagined that getting involved in forum discussions on social media could have lead to deadly consequences. The problem is that more often than not, that is precisely the case.

Over the years I have found myself getting into private conversations with people who fear a stalker showing up at their door someday and killing them. Virtually all of these people, and myself, have received death threats and calls for us to kill ourselves by complete strangers.

On November 10th of this year, I was in yet another one of these conversations when the person said “He’s going to come and kill me one day……. I’m a bus ticket away…….Mark my words….that guy is going to come for me one day.”

The significance of that date did not escape me for I live just a half hour from the site of one of strangest cases of stalking in living memory. In November of 2007 a Female astronaut drove across the country wearing a diaper so that she would not have to stop to go to the bathroom with the alleged goal of killing a woman dating a fellow astronaut.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/05/space.love/index.html

In the case of the person I was talking to, she was not dating a rival. In fact, the subject of her concern never met her. Her stalker, instead, embarked on an almost decade long stalking campaign against her accusing her and many others of things she did not do or did not say.

Anyone else who disagreed with this stalker soon came under attack not only by him but those who were part of his support group. More than one of them advocated the death of those he accused.

I also was the subject of death threats, not only by one of this stalker’s supporters but by others as well all due to the decision I made to engage in discussions on social media.

In a majority of cases these stalkers live hundreds and thousands of miles away from those they target. Many are of limited financial means. This has led to those who do not believe those who make these threats would be able to go with them to dismiss the threats  as nothing more than cruel threats that would not be carried out.

In light of the massive amount of violent incidents that have occurred lately, their arguments are no longer valid.

So, just how would someone of limited financial means go about carrying out his threat?

It is not that hard.

For example, one would only need to work for a temporary labor agency for one or two days to obtain the funds necessary to purchase a bus ticket. You can go from Chicago Illinois to Miami Florida for example for less than $100.00

Why a bus and not by car?

Several reasons, actually. First in most cases someone may not have a car that is capable of making the trip without breaking down. It may be in poor mechanical condition making the trip with it an unnecessary risk.

Next, unlike taking an airplane, a majority of bus terminals have no security measures. There is no homeland security at bus terminals. ID’s are rarely checked and the use of cash to buy a bus ticket is commonplace and thus would raise no concerns or suspicions.

There are no bomb sniffing dogs or metal detectors in most cases so if the stalker decided to take a weapon with him or her, it could be done easily.

So, the stalker now arrives at his destination and let us speculate that he/she did not take a weapon. It is quite easy to buy a weapon in most cases. The perfect example is a firearm. In Florida, for example, you can walk into a pawn shop and buy a used rifle for under a $100.00. There are no background checks required for rifles in the State of Florida.

If the stalker happens to arrive at a destination where there is a gun show, the process of buying a rifle is much easier and can be cheaper to purchase as well.

Once the stalker has the weapon, then what? Simple. The stalker then can use local transit to get around. Local transit buses and commuter trains are also inexpensive. A bicycle is also fairly cheap. A second hand one can be had for as little as $20.00.

Now, how does the stalker locate the victim. Again fairly easy, In a majority of cases where the death threats and other threats have been made, the person making the threat makes it clear that it knows all that is needed about the threatened including their name address place of employment and even the names and other sensitive information of friends and family.

This is because of the common practice of doxing or the documenting of all information about a person or persons that is done on the internet by those who wish to silence the victim through intimidation or in the case of the stalker declaring that “I know where you live.”

Now why would someone go through all of this trouble? The reasons are as many as there are people on the internet. In most cases there are personal issues with the stalker that causes them to reach an emotional state where they would go to this extreme.

In the case of the stalker in question and that of his supporter, these are two individuals that have a weak sense of self control. These types of individuals tend to lash out at others due to personal issues or the information about their target that has been provided from sources that may be questionable.

A stalker may have domestic issues that drive their anger. There could be a divorce or separation that was highly contested. There may be custody issues involving children that are highly contested by all parties involved. There may be problems with law enforcement and finally there may be issues where an alleged target of stalking may have taken legal measures to stop the stalking.

These and other factors could combine to rise the emotional distress to a point where the stalker reaches the decision that it is time to take the drastic action of carrying out the threats made on the internet.

If anything provides proof of such a scenario, the shooting in Texas where most of the attendees of a church service were either killed or wounded when a man stormed into the church and started shooting at them.

It turns out that he was in a domestic dispute with his mother in law who normally attended mass at that church and that she was likely one of his targets.

In conclusion it is time to take such threats seriously. In heated debates on the internet, emotions run high and the intensity of these debates can lead to extreme cases of anger.

It the extreme cases, this extreme anger can be deadly.

Stay tuned

MURT

 

 

There is a pizza delivery driver turned “investigative journalist” who once wrote a book. Haleigh Cummings – The Shocking Truth Revealed. Within that book are some interesting passages. Now when reading these passages, be reminded that the author is someone who claims to be investigating those he alleges are involved in pedophelia and the kidnapping and selling of children. 

An outline: These passages by the article describe his experiences when he died and went to hell:

” “Another spector runs up and assaults the baby-monster, biting into its toes and grinding them around in its teeth. The sound of squealing and crunching bones is audible as blood squirts all over, then turns into feces. Then, in an instant, the baby becomes a real human again. ‘What are you looking at fucker,’ it says. Then in an instant, I am inside of its intestines.””

Note the portion that describes “the baby-monster” and remember that once again this is someone deeply involved in missing and abused children cases.

Holmseth writes further:

“The specters are excreting on each other and eating it. They are engaging in sexual acts with instruments. They are raping and torturing each other. They are licking their fingers and giggling – they laugh and they cry – there is no up, down, or horizon. One of them tells me he wants to live inside of my bones, unpeels a banana, and then politely offers me a bit – his skin turns to banana peels – there are maggots on him that I can smell; I can taste the smell.” 

The thing that puzzles me is why would someone put this kind of content in a book about a missing child? Something is off here.

Two pages later comes this from Holmseth:

“I found myself inside the rectum of an animal; tasting the maggots of hell.” 

I do not know about you, dear reader, but this kind of thing in a book about a missing child gives me the creeps.

This is only a small portion of this book and is right at the beginning. There will be more.

Stay tuned

MURT

It seems that conspiracy theorist and pizza delivery driver Timothy Charles Holmseth has become the latest member of the Casey Anthony support group by declaring a recording made in 2009 may prove that Casey did not kill her daughter Caylee or at the least did not cause her death.

Tim negelected to point out in his article that to the horror of millions throughout the United States and elsewhere, Casey Anthony was acquitted of all charges and deemed Not Guilty in one of the most watched jury trials in US history. 

Holmseth also declared that the kidnapping of Haleigh Cummings may have been staged and once again turning his back on those who wanted justice for Haleigh.

What is important about this turn of events is that Timothy Holmseth is now on the same side of the Casey Anthony  innocence theory of those he claims are trying to get him shut down and in the process is turning his back on many of those who had supported him.

There were a number of bloggers and a young HLN guest from social media who supported to a degree the jury decision in the Anthony trial who attacked Tim Holmseth for his stance on the Anthony case at that time.

I had predicted in a meeting I had in Michigan some time back that Tim Holmseth would turn his back on the Caylee Warriors (later changed to Angels) in order to garner support for his causes and his efforts to make money off of the back of Caylee.

This latest article has proven me correct. Tim is now turning his back on the boycott group and has at least directed a minimal amount of support towards Casey in her efforts to prove her innocence and perhaps reap financial benefits from her loss of Caylee.

I was strongly criticized by those who are still seeking justice for Caylee for their belief that I had gone over to the side of the haters as they called them and many have turned their back on me for doing so.

Now, it seems that Timothy Charles Holmseth has turned his back on them as well.

Stay tuned

MURT

The biggest news lately is the accusation that Alabama Gop candidate Roy Moore had sexual relations with a 14 year old. This story has caused a heated debate all over the internet.

That is, oddly enough, with one exception. Not one word has come out of the blogger who for years had fought against something he labels #pedogate.

Timothy C Holmseth has, since 2009 blogged about his shadow government theory that a great number of those who hold public office are pedophiles who go around kidnapping children for use in human trafficking, pornography and other illegal practices.

I would have thought that Holmseth would have grabbed ahold of this latest revelation like a junk yard dog going after a trespasser.

I guess what is stopping him from doing so is the fact that Roy Moore is a conservative republican.

It looks like Holmseth’s problem with pedophiles depends largely upon party affiliation and the location of the pedophilia.

Holmseth did accuse a republican Governor and State Attorney of having ties to this kind of conduct but that was only because they were in Florida. The only time Holmseth has attacked anyone outside of Florida or Minnesota that I am aware of are either in Minnesota or North Dakota. 

Since Holmseth appears to be a supporter of Trump and others who are conservatives, this might explain why they are exempt from his accusations stemming from his #pedogate “investigations.”

Stay Tuned

MURT

I wrote this comment a short while before this submission in an effort to steer the debate on Tim Holmseth’s blog towards a common sense understanding of what he has written about and the nature of his allagation against scores of people in varying walks of life.

The thread of the comment section of the article he had written had little to do with the topic but, rather, was a discussion about the alleged personal conduct of a few people who took part in efforts to determine the fate of a still missing child.

I repeat my comment here because it is my understanding that not all comments are making it onto his blog. I know of at least one person who has made a comment there and it was never published.

Here is what I wrote:

    • “The problem with Holmseth’s writing is that he goes beyond accusations of social conduct. He accuses her and others of horrific crimes without a shred of proof. He has also gone so far as to name at least one Governor of a state and at least one State attorney of violating their oaths of office in the most disgusting manner possible. He has also accused scores of law enforcement of these same horrific crimes again with no concrete proof to back these accusations up.

      He then publishes these manifestos where he claims to have secret recordings and documents as well as statements of others regarding these accusations. He has yet to provide this proof citing the excuse that he would be arrested if he were to divulge this so-called evidence.

      Common sense would have to have an unbiased person ask why on earth the evidence that would solve scores of child abductions and murders as well as stopping such things as human trafficking, satanic ritual abuses, and pornography, as well as pedophile rings, would result in the arrest of the person who would be considered a hero for doing so lead him to being arrested because he divulged this information.

      IF Holmseth was to present this evidence to law enforcement and to the public in an uncensored and unredacted manner, he may well receive the thanks of scores of people who have been the victims of such alleged conduct or even more so receive the undying gratitude of the family and loved ones of the alleged victims of such horrific criminal acts.

      He would be a hero.

      If it turns out that Holmseth did NOT have the proof he so declares and this truth is born out at some future date, he may well be scorned as the sick and evil individual who victimized not only those he has so wrongly accused but as someone who with his twisted and evil writings victimized the loved ones of those who have either been murdered or remain missing.

      Rather than fight about the alleged social misconduct of a certain few individuals, it is those facts that need to be considered above all else.

      MURT”

      I stand by these words. What needs to be examined is the FACTS of each and every case Holmseth discusses from other sources besides his blog or any blog for that matter. There are outside sources of information that can be checked. Official records, court records and so forth.
      The problem at present is that the true crime social media is rife with abuses. People engage in horrific acts of false news, false information, and false accusations.
      They do so with the knowledge that there is rarely any accounting for their actions. They cannot be sued because they are not worth suing. Most of these abuses are of modest means often living off the taxpayers in the city or state where they reside as well as federal taxes that pay for programs directed to the poor.
    • They hide behind the first amendment knowing full well that slander, libel and defamation of character is not part of it.
    • They have the freedom to lie and they exercise that freedom quite efficently.
    • If there is a solution to the problem of these individuals wantonly destroying lives, I have not found it.
    • I doubt a solution will ever be found.
    • Stay tuned
    • MURT

It has become the custom of late for conspiacy theorists, armchair detectives, pundents, and critics of one group or another to rush to judgement when an event like the shooting in South Texas takes place. The blame is always put at the feet of a political party, a group advocating a cause or a religious group or race. 

The true cause lies not in any radicalization by a group but, instead of the people around those who engage in these actions not seeing or not wanting to see an impending disaster due to a single or series of events surrounding the individual who partakes such actions. 

All too frequently, signs of trouble go unnoticed prior to an action only to be tragicly clear in hindsight. All too often it would have been an early intervention that could have prevented such extreme tragedies.

Such was the case with Davin Patrick Kelly. It is all to easy to blame radicalization as the cause of his actions when the actual cause may be elsewhere. The root cause of his action Sunday may be mearly the accumulation of significant events that compiled into an increasing amount of pressure and stress upon a person incapable of dealing whith what life has thrown at him.  He may have simply snapped. This is not an excuse but is a cause of action.

Do not mistake this as a way to excuse what he and others have done but rather, an embarking on a path to understanding the early signs of trouble so that early interventions into the lives of other troubled invididuals may prevent such disasterous actions in the future.

Remember the expression that Homeland Security and law enforcement agencies repeat time and again when trying to get us to be aware of these kinds of situations ” if you see something, say something. If you see something do something.” 

This advice applies to seeing the early signs of trouble and stepping in to prevent matters becoming worse. If you see someone around you acting increasingly erratic, do what you can to alleviate the situation. If you are unable to do this on your own, seek assistance from whomever would be capable of rendering the kind of aid and resources that may be necessary.

Do not stand aside and do nothing. If you do not take the appropriate actions when you are able to and the situation reaches the point of no return. There may become a day when something drastic and horrible happens and then you may be filled with the guilt of knowing that you could have done something but instead, decided to sit by and do nothing.

Stay Tuned

MURT

 

There is yet another legal action under study by someone other than Thomas Olsen. This pending action may spell a fate worse for Mr Holmseth other than having to redact names from his media empire.

Under the Olsen action, the worst that might happen to Holmseth is that he would be permanantly under an order to pay whatever judgement is granted the court or jury should Mr Olsen prevail.

If Holmseth were to come into a large cash infusion or valuable assets, they would be subject to seizure to go towards payment of the judgement.

The new legal action being studied, however, would spell the end of the Holmseth media empire entirely.

If and when this new lawsuit goes forward, I will publish as many details as I am able to.

In the meantime

Stay Tuned

MURT

During my last webcast the subject of Diana Napolis came up. I was reminded that Diana Napolis was involved in actions quite similar to Timothy Holmseth and her fate was much the same that Tim Holmseth faces when the complaints against him are resolved.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Napolis

Both Tim Holmseth and Diana Napolis have concentrated on the debunked subject of Satanic Ritual Abuse. This nonsense was debated on the internet extensively for decades until the accusations made by those advocating this conspiracy were debunked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_ritual_abuse

With Timothy Charles Holmseth, however, this screwball subject is enjoying something of a revival. Holmseth is also engaging in a practice that mirrors Ms. Napolis. He is accusing people both famous and not of being involved in this activity as well as in other illegal actions involving children. 

Diana Napolis used to go by the username of Curio and would terrorize and threaten her victims until she was caught in a sting by a woman known as Shadowraiths who also ran a forum named Usleuths.

http://www.konformist.com/2002/curio-tribune.htm

Ms Napolis was ordered to surrender all of her weapons and sentenced to 5 years probation. She was also permanantly banned from accessing the internet. This is one of the earliest known cases where someone was convicted of stalking over the internet and being banned from it as well.

Because of actions of certain individuals California had adopted what is considered the strongest laws against stalking and cyber stalking in the country. Ms Napolis was one of the first cases of Cyber Stalking under that law.

It would appear that at some point Tim Holmseth will be yet another individual convicted under the same criminal statutes enacted in Florida and other stantes and meet the same fate as Napolis.

One can only hope and wait.

Stay tuned

MURT